MisterRichardson.com Rotating Header Image

My favorite books – John Owen

As we approach the end of the school year, many of us will be making plans for the summer. If you’re like me, those plans will include much more time for reading. So I thought I would start making a list of my favorite books and share it with those who might be interested.

First up is John Owen.

The greatest of the Puritan authors is John Owen. He is also probably the most difficult of the Puritans to read, but don’t let that stop you from reading him. I have found myself going along reading Owen and then coming across a phrase or a sentence or a paragraph and having to stop and think about it for a few days, before I can go back to reading him.

Currently there are several different editions available from Volume 6 of John Owen’s Works. Volume 6 deals with sin and how to go about killing it. It is a totally different take than what you might find today in a typical “Christian” bookstore, or on “Christian” radio. So it’s worth taking a look at these just for that. Books like The Mortification of Sin, Overcoming Sin and Temptation,  Triumph Over Temptation, and Temptation: Resisted and Repulsed, are modernized for today’s readers and well worth your time.

There are various other paperback editions of Owen’s works printed by the Banner of Truth, as well as the complete works, that are all well worth your time.

You can find these books at Cumberland Valley Bible Book Service (which I use a lot), Reformation Heritage Books, or Christian Book Distributors. Amazon also carries some, but not all, of these books.

John Owen on Justification

It is vain to recommend the doctrine of justification unto them who neither desire nor endeavor to be justified.

But where any persons are really made sensible of their apostasy from God, of the evil of their natures and lives, with the dreadful consequences that attend thereon, in the wrath of God and eternal punishment due unto sin; they cannot well judge themselves more concerned in anything than in the knowledge of that divine way whereby they may be delivered from this condition.

“Christian” “music” “artist” questions Scripture

I had never heard of Jennifer Knapp until a few weeks ago when she “came out.” I don’t know what she looks like and couldn’t tell you anything about her music. But I can tell you she’s got some serious problems with the Bible.

She recently appeared on Larry King to promote herself debate the issue of homosexuality with a preacher who seemed to be sound in the faith and Ted Haggard. Here’s what she had to say:

Well, I think there is plenty of evidence in my exploration of my faith through the sacred text of the Holy Bible that I have definitely recognized that we are somewhat at the handicap of our own interpretation of a sacred text.

In case you were handicapped by your own interpretation of her speech there, I think she said that some of us are wrong about what the Bible says and it really bothers her. The article on the Christian Post summed it up like this:

During her appearance on CNN’s Larry King Live on Friday, Knapp pointed out that believers rely on a text that is not in the original language. She said scholars have questioned the interpretation of the original Greek words that have been translated to homosexuality.

Though acknowledging that she is by no means a scholar or theologian, Knapp brought up the Bible translation issue to challenge those who cite the Bible as stating that homosexuality is a sin.

Yes. That’s what I thought she would say. I’m surprised she didn’t say anything about the original Hebrew. But then again, I might be handicapped by my interpretation.

So, see how you might interpret Leviticus 18 and who you’re supposed to have sex with:

6 ” ‘No one is to approach any close relative to have sexual relations. I am the LORD.

7 ” ‘Do not dishonor your father by having sexual relations with your mother. She is your mother; do not have relations with her.

8 ” ‘Do not have sexual relations with your father’s wife; that would dishonor your father.

9 ” ‘Do not have sexual relations with your sister, either your father’s daughter or your mother’s daughter, whether she was born in the same home or elsewhere.

10 ” ‘Do not have sexual relations with your son’s daughter or your daughter’s daughter; that would dishonor you.

11 ” ‘Do not have sexual relations with the daughter of your father’s wife, born to your father; she is your sister.

12 ” ‘Do not have sexual relations with your father’s sister; she is your father’s close relative.

13 ” ‘Do not have sexual relations with your mother’s sister, because she is your mother’s close relative.

14 ” ‘Do not dishonor your father’s brother by approaching his wife to have sexual relations; she is your aunt.

15 ” ‘Do not have sexual relations with your daughter-in-law. She is your son’s wife; do not have relations with her.

16 ” ‘Do not have sexual relations with your brother’s wife; that would dishonor your brother.

17 ” ‘Do not have sexual relations with both a woman and her daughter. Do not have sexual relations with either her son’s daughter or her daughter’s daughter; they are her close relatives. That is wickedness.

18 ” ‘Do not take your wife’s sister as a rival wife and have sexual relations with her while your wife is living.

19 ” ‘Do not approach a woman to have sexual relations during the uncleanness of her monthly period.

20 ” ‘Do not have sexual relations with your neighbor’s wife and defile yourself with her.

21 ” ‘Do not give any of your children to be sacrificed to Molech, for you must not profane the name of your God. I am the LORD.

22 ” ‘Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable.

23 ” ‘Do not have sexual relations with an animal and defile yourself with it. A woman must not present herself to an animal to have sexual relations with it; that is a perversion.

Wow, that’s a whole lot rules about a whole lot of people (and animals) with whom you’re not supposed to have sex. Also, there’s the prohibition of child sacrifice thrown in for good measure. Most of this could be summed up in the Seventh Commandment, which says not to commit adultery. But just in case you are handicapped by your interpretation, it seems God has gone into embarrassing details just to make sure this doesn’t happen.

Another “Christian” “music” “artist” “comes out”

Jennifer Knapp, with whose music I am not familiar, has recently shocked her fans in the Christian music world by acknowledging that she is in an eight-year “relationship” with another woman. The Christian Post article that reports this also states that this move allows Jennifer to be “wholly myself.”

The only problem with this is that Ms. Knapp claims to be a Christian while embracing a practice that is incompatible with Biblical teaching. And the fact that she is not the first Christian music artist to “come out” is an additional problem.

This just shows that many people don’t have a clue as to what real Christianity is. They somehow believe that the Bible teaches “love” without also teaching holiness. That it teaches “freedom” without also teaching responsibility.

But the worst thing here is that many in the church have lost the whole concept of original sin or depravity. Rather than look to a Savior to save you from yourself and your sin, now you look to “God” who helps you be yourself. Forget all that stuff about how all our own righteousness is like filthy rags, or that in me nothing good dwells. No, you’re good enough, you’re smart enough, and people like you for just being you.

Many people speak of finding peace when they embrace their “alternate” lifestyles, but that’s only because they quit fighting. They surrendered. They gave up and they gave in to the spirit of the world.

This “coming out” represents nothing more than the failure to teach Biblical doctrine and thinking in our churches. It is the embodiment of a narcissistic view of spirituality that bears more of a resemblance to secular humanism than Christianity. We should embrace Christ, not ourselves, and realize that our whole life on this earth is an exercise in fighting the flesh, not embracing it. It is a lifestyle of crucifying the flesh, not coddling it. I do not get to indulge myself in a sin just because “I was born that way,” because we were all born that way.

Do not be misled: “Bad company corrupts good character.” Come back to your senses as you ought, and stop sinning; for there are some who are ignorant of God—I say this to your shame. – 1 Corinthians 15:33-34

Their idea of pleasure is to carouse in broad daylight. They are blots and blemishes, reveling in their pleasures while they feast with you. With eyes full of adultery, they never stop sinning; they seduce the unstable; they are experts in greed—an accursed brood! – 2 Peter 3:13-14

But you, man of God, flee from all this, and pursue righteousness, godliness, faith, love, endurance and gentleness. Fight the good fight of the faith. Take hold of the eternal life to which you were called when you made your good confession in the presence of many witnesses. – 1 Timothy 6:11-12

Builder of the first personal computer has died

Dr. Henry Edward Roberts, who designed the Altair 8800 credited with being the world’s first personal computer, died in Georgia at age 68, according to reports.

Roberts died Thursday of pneumonia at a hospital in Macon, Georgia, according to the UPI.

Roberts founded Micro Instrumentation and Telemetry Systems in 1970, where he later developed the Altair 8800 based on the new Intel 8080 microprocessor. The $397 computer sold well, and inspired Microsoft founders Bill Gates and Paul Allen to join the company.

Read the rest of the article.

Obama’s hypocrisy

Roe v. Wade “not only protects women’s health and reproductive freedom, but stands for a broader principle: that government should not intrude on our most private family matters,” Obama said in a statement.

- CNN

CLINTON: Sen. Obama has a mandate in his plan. It’s a mandate on parents to provide health insurance for their children. That’s about 150 million people.

OBAMA: I have no objection to Sen. Clinton thinking that her approach is superior. But we still don’t know how Sen. Clinton intends to enforce a mandate.

CLINTON: Sen. Obama would enforce the mandate by requiring parents to buy insurance for their children.

OBAMA: This is true.

CLINTON: If you have a mandate, it has to be enforceable. So there’s no difference here.

OBAMA: No, there is a difference. I do provide a mandate for children, because we have created programs in which we can have greater assurance that those children will be covered at an affordable price. But we don’t want to put adults in a situation in which, on the front end, we are mandating them, we are forcing them to purchase insurance, and if the subsidies are inadequate, the burden is on them, and they will be penalized. And that is what Sen. Clinton’s plan does.

- Democratic Debate, Cleveland, February 26, 2008

CLINTON: [Obama & I] do have differences on health care. I believe absolutely passionately that we must have universal health care. It is a moral responsibility [to] move us to universal health care.

OBAMA: About 95% of our plans are similar. We both set up a government plan that would [cover] pre-existing conditions. We both want to emphasize prevention. But I emphasize reducing costs. If we provide subsidies to those who can’t afford it, they will buy it. Sen. Clinton has a different approach. She believes that we have to force people who don’t have health insurance to buy it, or there will be a lot of people who don’t get it. But if you are going to mandate the purchase of insurance & it’s not affordable, then there’s going to have to be some enforcement mechanism that the government uses. And they may charge fines to people who already don’t have health care, or take it out of their paychecks. And that, I don’t think, is helping those without health insurance. That is a genuine difference.

- Democratic Debate in Los Angeles, January 30, 2008

The promise of America says each of us has the freedom to make of our own lives what we will, but we also have the obligation to treat each other with dignity and respect. It’s a promise that businesses should live up to their responsibilities to create American jobs, look out for American workers, and play by the rules of the road. Ours is a promise that says government cannot solve all our problems, but it should do what we cannot do for ourselves–protect us from harm and provide every child a decent education; keep our water clean and our toys safe; invest in new schools and new roads and new science and technology. Our government should work for us, not against us. It should help us, not hurt us. It should ensure opportunity not just for those with the most money and influence, but for every American who’s willing to work. That’s the promise of America–the idea that we are responsible for ourselves, but that we also rise or fall as one nation. That’s the promise we need to keep.

- 2008 Democratic National Convention

The establishment of tyranny

2 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If an applicable individual
3 fails to meet the requirement of subsection (a) for 1
4 or more months during any calendar year beginning
5 after 2013, then, except as provided in subsection (d),
6 there is hereby imposed a penalty with respect to the
7 individual in the amount determined under sub8
section (c).

13 ‘‘(3) APPLICABLE DOLLAR AMOUNT.—For pur
14 poses of paragraph (1)—
15 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in
16 subparagraphs (B) and (C), the applicable dollar
17 amount is $750.